Oil is a perfectly normal thing for an institutional investor to invest in. “I think oil prices will go up so I’m gonna buy some oil”: very common thought process. But if you are a hedge fund, or a pension fund, or an endowment, and you think oil prices will go up, and you want to buy oil, you have a bit of a problem, which is: Where will you it? Oil is … slippery? “It is also highly toxic, very difficult to store, and it smells bad,” my Bloomberg colleague Tracy Alloway once wrote. “Don’t try to buy a barrel of oil,” a broker told her; “It’ll kill you.”
But people want to buy oil, and financial markets abhor a vacuum, so there are ways for them to buy oil. Chiefly institutional investors buy oil , which allow them to bet on the price of oil without actually having to put smelly barrels in their garage. Futures are non-toxic and odorless, and you can store them in a computer. But of course some institutions—mostly specialists in energy trading—go and trade actual physical oil, and have the … tankers or ventilated warehouses or whatever … necessary to store it. And their trading—buying futures and selling physical oil, or vice versa—is what keeps futures prices in line with the actual price of oil. They provide, if you will, synthetic oil storage: If I want exposure to the price of oil without storing it, I buy futures, and the person who sells me the futures might be an arbitrageur who is hedging by buying and storing the oil herself.
Bitcoin is also, as far as I can tell, slippery, toxic, very difficult to store, and it smells bad. In particular, the history of Bitcoin involves a lot of incidents of:
- People losing or forgetting their private keys and being unable to access the Bitcoins they store directly in a Bitcoin wallet; and
- Exchanges getting hacked and losing the Bitcoins that they were storing for their customers.
If you are a person who is enthusiastic about Bitcoin, that is I suppose all part of the fun of investing in a novel censorship-resistant decentralized form of currency. But if you are an institutional investor, losing your Bitcoins because you forgot your private key, or because the exchange where you stored them got hacked again, is a bad look. Your clients will be unimpressed. This reality limits the ability of institutions to buy a lot of Bitcoin.
And now it’s changing:
“There are a lot of investors where custodianship was the final barrier,” [Multicoin Capital partner Kyle] Samani said in a phone interview. “Over the next year, the market will come to recognize that custodianship is a solved problem. This will unlock a big wave of capital.”
Samani has been “testing Coinbase Inc.’s new crypto custody service, one of scores of such offerings in development.”
Such projects would pave the way for vast tracts of investors to expand into crypto, potentially reviving prices in markets that have tumbled in recent weeks. Regulated crypto custody would allow more institutional buyers — such as hedge funds and pensions — to invest in Bitcoin, Ether and a multitude of other coins. Retail brokerages would have a safer way to let clients add crypto to portfolios stuffed with stocks and bonds.
And the services would provide peace of mind to Samani and other fund managers who’ve already waded into the market. Most investment advisers are required by the SEC to keep client funds with a qualified custodian.
Of course if the fate of all Bitcoin exchanges is to be hacked, then I am not sure that certification by the Securities and Exchange Commission will change that, and I look forward to the first qualified institutional Bitcoin custodian being hacked.
Remember, like, six months ago, when Cboe Global Markets Inc. and CME Group Inc. introduced Bitcoin futures? Part of the appeal of Bitcoin futures was that they would provide a convenient way for institutional investors to get short Bitcoin. But another part of the appeal—I still think the dominant part—was that they would provide a convenient way for institutional investors to get Bitcoin. Just as with oil, if you are an institution, you can buy Bitcoin synthetically in the form of futures, and be exposed to its price movements, and let someone else—the person on the other side of the futures trade—worry about how to store the Bitcoins. You avoid the problem of custody by owning your Bitcoins synthetically. The Bitcoin futures, it seemed to me and a lot of people, “would pave the way for vast tracts of investors to expand into crypto,” boosting prices as institutional investors could finally get safe clean regulated exposure to Bitcoins.
And then Bitcoin futures started trading, and they were pretty tiny in comparison to the volume of actual physical Bitcoin trading, and the price of Bitcoin promptly fell off a cliff.
So I don’t know! Institutional-grade custodianship for Bitcoin seems like a good idea. But I have been burned once before. Providing the legal and regulatory and compliance tools for institutional investors to buy Bitcoins is, you know, fine. But if that’s all it took for a vast wave of pent-up institutional demand to come rolling into Bitcoin, that would have happened by now.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
James Greiff at firstname.lastname@example.org